In my Late Shakespeare course, we read Othello, Macbeth, King Lear, Measure for Measure, The Winter's Tale, and The Tempest. Three tragedies and three late comedies, or problem plays. As Lear was my favorite play of the quarter, I chose to write my longer paper on Peter Brook's film adaptation.
The adaptation drew mixed critical responses. Some reviews praised
the film’s cinematography and Brook’s reinterpretation of the play. Others
criticized Brook’s unconventionality or found fault in his drastic cuts to the
original text. At first, I found the textual cuts and scene jumping rather
distressing; and Paul Scofield’s Lear seemed too subdued or flat. But
eventually, I stopped trying to follow along with the text, set aside my copy
of Lear, and allowed myself to be
taken in by Brook’s stark and cruel universe. Because I was particularly struck by Brook’s creation of the
storm sequence, I decided to undertake a closer examination of these scenes.
Throughout the scenes on the heath, Brook uses what R.B.
Parker calls a “layering effect” (Parker 80). In his article “The Use of
‘Mise-en-Scène’ in Three Film of ‘King Lear,’” Parker quotes Brook explaining
how his camera technique mirrors Shakespeare’s language:
If you could extract the mental
impression made by the Shakespearean strategy of imagery…you would get a piece
of pop collage. The effect is like a word whose letters are written across
three overlapping pictures in the mind. You see the actor as a man standing in
the distance and you also see his face very, very close to you—perhaps his
profile and the back of his head at the same time—and you also see the
background (Barker 80).
To
capture this impression, Brook uses metacinematic cuts, close ups, angles, and
lighting throughout the storm scene. Many shots
appear fuzzy and indistinct because of rain-blurred lens or significant fog
levels.
The storm often seems to have control
over what we see: flashes of lightning illuminate Lear’s face and the rain
blurs our entire view. Even when the camera drifts away from the king, as if
blown off course, a crack of thunder summons us to a quick shot of Lear. As the storm worsens and Lear’s mind
deteriorates, the cutting becomes faster and faster. Sometimes, Brook quickly alternates
between two profile shots, and the effect is one of Lear arguing with himself. Later on, he will use a similar camera
strategy with some of Edgar’s “Poor Tom” speeches. By using these film and editing techniques, Brook reinforces
the storm as an externalization of the king’s madness, and creates a distinct
visualization of his breakdown.
Here's a longish clip of the storm scene:
I rewatched what I think is my favorite version of King Lear... the 1998 Ian Holm adaptation. I really like Ian Holm as Lear. And I like the minimalistic scenery. Also, guess who plays Kent... David Burke! He plays a wonderful Dr. Watson in the Sherlock Holmes adaptations produced by Granada Television. I was pleased as punch to make this discovery.
Still planning on watching the Ian Mckellen Lear. Next on my list.
Moving onward.
A few weeks back I went to see Ralph Fiennes' Coriolanus. It was most brilliant and now I want to read the play... of course. The film had an amazing cast as well: Ralph Fiennes, Gerard Butler, Vanessa Redgrave, Brian Cox, and Jessica Chastain.
And... last Friday, I saw the UW Undergraduate Theater Society's production of Macbeth. I was absolutely blown away by their performance.
When I read Macbeth for the first time, the play didn't appeal to me. But I think that was because the play relies heavily on visual spectacle... something you miss completely when reading. UTS's adaptation was stunning and creative and very very moving. I was glued to my seat throughout the entire second half of the play. Moved to tears by Macduff. Breathless by the end.
Photos courtesy of UW Student Life
When I read Macbeth for the first time, the play didn't appeal to me. But I think that was because the play relies heavily on visual spectacle... something you miss completely when reading. UTS's adaptation was stunning and creative and very very moving. I was glued to my seat throughout the entire second half of the play. Moved to tears by Macduff. Breathless by the end.
Photos courtesy of UW Student Life
![]() |
| Macbeth lying in a pool of blood |
![]() |
| The Macbeths |
![]() |
| The witches (& Banquo, off to the side) |






love love love... also kind of mourning the end of our Shakespeare class =(
ReplyDeleteDavid Burke was an excellent Watson! An excellent foil to Brett's Holmes.
ReplyDeleteHave you read the book "Bending the Willow: Jeremy Brett as Sherlock Holmes" by David Stuart Davies. This book is a must read for fans of the Granada adaptation and/or Jeremy Brett.
Cheers!